The manuscript may contain ABSTRACT, KEYWORDS, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS, RESULTS, DISCUSSION (or RESULTS AND DISCUSSION), CONCLUSIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST and REFERENCES, and any other information that the author(s) may consider necessary.
Title should be concise and informative. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviations where possible.
A structured abstract of 300 words should be prepared with clear sub-sections namely, background, methods, results, and conclusion. Must be self-explanatory, stating the rationale, objective(s), methodology, main results, and conclusions of the study. Abbreviations, if used, must be defined on the first mention in the Abstract as well as in the main text. Abstract of review articles may have a variable format (font size 10; max 250 words).
Keywords: Three to eight keywords, depicting the article (font size 10).
Provide a clear and concise statement of the problem, citing relevant recent literature, and objectives of the investigation.
Begin by describing the problem that you wanted to solve through the piece of research you are writing about. Provide an adequate background. Explain why that problem is important. Next, briefly review what has been done so far to solve the problem. Finally, introduce the study by pointing out what is new about this research as compared to past research. State the objectives of the work.
Provide an adequate account of the procedures or experimental details,
including
statistical tests (if any), concisely but sufficient to replicate the study.
This section may be divided by subheadings. It should provide a concise and
precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation as
well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.
2.1 Study Design: Present key elements of study design early in the paper.
2.2 Setting: Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data collection.
2.3 Participants (if any): Give the eligibility criteria and the sources and methods of selection of Participants
2.4 Variables: Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and effect Give diagnostic criteria, if applicable.
2.5 Data Sources/Measurement: For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of assessment (measurement). Describe comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group
2.6 Sample Design: Explain the type of sampling and how the sample size was arrived at.
2.7 Statistical methods:
2.8 Ethical considerations: (if applicable) describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias.
The purpose of the Results section is to present the key results of your research. Be clear and concise with the help of appropriate Tables, Figures, and other illustrations. Data should not be repeated in Tables and Figures but must be supported with statistics.
Authors should discuss the results and how they can be interpreted in the perspective of previous studies and of the working hypotheses. The findings and their implications should be discussed in the broadest context possible. Future research directions may also be highlighted.
This section is mandatory. The conclusion is intended to help the reader understand why your research should matter to them after they have finished reading the paper. A conclusion is not merely a summary of the main topics covered or a re-statement of your research problem, but a synthesis of key points and, if applicable, where you recommend new areas for future research. For most essays, one well-developed paragraph is sufficient for a conclusion, although in some cases, a two or three paragraph conclusion may be required (Bunton, 2005).
For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided.
Please add: “This research received no external funding” or “This research was funded by [name of funder] grant number [xxx]”. Check carefully that the details given are accurate and use the standard spelling of funding agency names at https://search.crossref.org/funding, any errors may affect your future funding.
In this section, the author(s) can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments) (font size 10).
Declare conflicts of interest or state “The authors declare no conflict of interest.” Authors must identify and declare any personal circumstances or interest that may be perceived as inappropriately influencing the representation or interpretation of reported research results. Any role of the funders in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results must be declared in this section. If there is no role, please state “The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results”.
References must be arranged following American Psychological Association (APA) 6th Style. We recommend using the references management software, such as EndNote, Reference Manager, Mendeley or Zotero to avoid typing mistakes and duplicated references. Include the digital object identifier (DOI) for all references and list them in the REFERENCES section (font size 10). In-text citation (APA) style.